Kimon Nicolaides
Repeating the same "technique" from golf course to golf course is often misrepresented as "style". It really is an exercise in oversimplification.
I believe every project has one or more "styles" that can yield a cost effective golf course. The challenge is getting the builder to build it. That's why I am on-site daily. Builders are not architects and most haven't studied great architecture. They are not familiar with the multitude of possible styles.
To create individuality, the architect has to lead daily. Otherwise that novel concept is not likely to be produced in the architect's absence... and the typical golf architect only commits to a handful of visits. This leaves huge information gaps between architect and builder. How do these architects close these information gaps?
They simplify and repeat.
Simplification and repetition is the safe way to the finish line, but certainly not the safe way to make your mark in the market. You can see this repetition in your travels... the same "style" in Bangkok, Berlin or Boston... only the vegetation changes the setting.
The way to ensure against "stagnation" is to hire an architect who is committed to your project daily. Why else be there if not to create individuality and excellence?
Tony Ristola
agolfarchitect.com
agolfarchitect@yahoo.com
+49 (0)173 450 4552
+1(909) 581 0080
